Welcome

Facebook Feed

David Chapin http://www.fromthetrenchesworldreport.com/gop-congressman-stephen-fincher-on-a-mission-from-god-starve-the-poor-while-personally-pocketing-millions-in-farm-subsidies/45286#comment-406514 May 25, 2013 3:44 pm
Bill Kosloskey Our pastor, Chuck Baldwin, will be live on the Patriot Voice in the 12-3 pm segment on Alex Jones to discuss, amongst other things, why Christians should NOT give up their guns (from a Bible perspective). May 23, 2013 12:14 pm
David Chapin I hope we shall crush in its birth the aristocracy of our monied corporations which dare already to challenge our government to a trial by strength, and bid defiance to the laws of our country. Thomas Jefferson May 23, 2013 10:13 am
Debora Burk Help, cant get u tuned in. houghton lake ????? May 22, 2013 3:58 pm
Kevin Cuzzort Thanks for the shout-out guys, im a new listener to your show and Patriot Voice net. "GOOD STUFF"! :) May 22, 2013 10:37 am
David Chapin A law declaring that proposing any legislation encroaching on the 2nd Amendment (and all the rest) to be a CRIMINAL ACT. Maybe Dan Benishek would sponsor it. Though Justin Amash would be far more likely to. May 21, 2013 5:15 pm
David Chapin No wonder Bill Kristol has remained so positive about her while other neocons have fled. He helped push her to the veep ticket—and won out against Karl Rove. (With an update after a Weekly Standard blog post Friday night critiquing this piece.) In June 2007, a cruise hosted by the political journal The Weekly Standard set anchor in Juneau, Alaska. Standard editors William Kristol and Fred Barnes then lunched with Governor Sarah Palin. It was a moment of discovery to equal Hernando Cortez’s landing at Veracruz. The Daily Telegraph’s Tim Shipman saw this encounter as the launch of a Neoconservative project surrounding Palin. He interviewed a former Republican White House official now at the American Enterprise Institute about Palin: “She’s bright and she’s a blank page. She’s going places and it’s worth going there with her.” Asked if he sees her as a “project,” the former official said: “Your word, not mine, but I wouldn’t disagree with the sentiment. Kristol appeared on Fox News on June 30, 2008, confidently predicting that McCain would select Sarah Palin and as a public display of support, oil prices would miraculously fall. Kristol can fairly lay claim to having “discovered” Palin for Washington political circles. Palin’s name appeared in 41 Weekly Standard articles since the Juneau meeting—starting with a paean entitled “The Most Popular Governor” that ran right after the reception. Indeed, Kristol, who was a loyal McCain supporter in 2000 and is often thought to have suffered exclusion from Bush’s inner circle as a result, may have played a key role in McCain’s decision to tap Palin as his running mate. A McCain campaign insider described to me a tight three-way competition between Palin, Joe Lieberman, and Mitt Romney in the final days. McCain himself, it was no secret, wanted Lieberman to be his running mate, but his senior advisors were adamant that Lieberman could not be sold to the Republican base. A Lieberman nomination might risk exposing serious fissures in the party at the convention in Saint Paul. The inner circle broke down between two choices. Those close to Karl Rove united around Romney. Rove engaged in heavy lobbying in an effort to get McCain to embrace Romney. Others, of whom Kristol was the most prominent, pushed Sarah Palin—arguing that she was young, popular, vigorous, unknown and had the right connections to the Religious Right bloc which had proven so important to Republican wins in 2000 and 2004. Karl Rove himself recognized, with typical insight, that Palin was the real challenger. He attacked Virginia Governor Tim Kaine as an ill-suited candidate for the vice presidential slot on the Democratic ticket. Kaine, of course, had a resume almost identical to Palin’s—he had been a small city mayor and then had served, for less than two years, as governor—and McCain campaign insiders understood the swipe differently from others. Did Rove really care about Kaine’s darkhorse candidacy for the Democrats, or was he launching a cloaked attack on Palin? (In a recent appearance, Rove was asked if he thought Palin would make a good president. “I don’t know” was his unenthusiastic answer. Kristol, in any event, was quick to press the campaign for the Palin candidacy with the party’s faithful. Taking a cue from the Straussian handbook, Kristol appeared on Fox News on June 30, 2008, confidently predicting that McCain would select Sarah Palin and as a public display of support, oil prices would miraculously fall. And indeed, weeks after the Palin pick, oil prices did tumble—though analysts link this to concerns about the crisis in financial institutions and not Sarah Palin. After the nomination, conservative columnists have been very critical of the Palin candidacy. Some have openly distanced themselves from it, such as National Review’s Kathleen Parker, who called on Palin voluntarily to quit the ticket. David Brooks referred to Palin as a “cancer on the Republican Party.” Peggy Noonan was overheard grumbling about the choice as “political bullshit” on an open mike on MSNBC. George Will told a gathering of Senate aides that Palin was “obviously not qualified” to be vice president. Former presidential speechwriter David Frum called the choice a gamble and then said he felt it was “disturbing.” Charles Krauthammer called the choice “near suicidal.” Kristol is one of the few conservative columnists whose support of Palin has been unflinching. He has used his space as a New York Times columnist to tout her candidacy repeatedly. But in the process Kristol has never bothered to disclose his role in the decision making process that led to the Palin pick. Kristol’s Weekly Standard has figured as Palin’s chief defender, and its writers have gone after even those who dare to pose questions about Palin’s candidacy. Bill Kristol, it seems, has much at stake in the Palin candidacy. This article has been updated and corrected in response to a post at the Weekly Standard blog by Jonathan Last, which details the Juneau meeting and notes that the Daily Telegraph piece was not quoted in proper context. The corrections are appreciated and the post is worth a gander. ################## ############## ######## Sarah Palin: Religion as political tool December 5, 4:05 PMPortland Humanist ExaminerMicha J. Stone Sarah Palin demonstrates mastery of the Christian vernacular, deftly wielding the language of religion as a political tool. In a recently released interview Palin urged the United States to dedicate itself to seeking God’s will, arguing a humble spirit could help leaders get more answers on issues such as health care, energy and national security. Palin, the 2008 Republican candidate for vice president, speaks frankly and convincingly of her unapologetic faith in a video released Friday by the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association. If Sarah Palin has a secret weapon, it is religion. Palin can talk the talk, and the Christian right can't get enough of it. Palin is not embarrassed to make the feeble minded intellectual claims required of a Christian fundamentalist. For example, from the interview, Palin on creation: When I was just a child, I, looking around, the grand creation that is Alaska, I knew in my heart and soul that someone had created the greatness that we call Alaska. There is a folksy wholesomeness in these words that act as a siren call to the Republican right. But the words have a dark side. Palin's Christian speak articulates a world view that is anti-intellectual, anti-science, anti-knowledge. Indeed the Christian fundamentalist world view is ultimately anti-life, filled with visions of apocalypse and end days. People who have such fantasies and visions should not be given any political power. Palin is a perfect storm of political instinct, charisma, and anti-intellectual-Christian-fundamentalism dumb. Her ability to tap into the Christian hive mind should be frightening to all American free thinkers. ############### ####################### ############### Tea Party Sarah is a Neocon Kurt Nimmo Infowars.com February 7, 2010 Sarah Palin delivered a speech prior to her keynote at the Republican Tea Party fest in Nashville scheduled for this weekend. In addition to touching on government spending and the bankster bailout, Palin said the underwear bomber Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab should have been grilled before he was read his Miranda rights. Neocon Sarah sets her sights on the Tea Party movement. featured stories Tea Party Sarah is a Neocon scott brown featured stories Tea Party Sarah is a Neocon “We need a commander in chief, not a professor of constitutional law,” she said, according to the Wichita Eagle. In fact, Obama was not a professor of constitutional law. He was a “senior lecturer” at the University of Chicago Law School. In academia, there is a vast difference between the two titles, not that we should expect Palin (or her script writers) to get it right. Palin, the darling of the Tea Party movement (or the one hijacked by statist neocons), is merely echoing the Republican idea that supposed terrorists accused by the government do not deserve Fifth Amendment protection and should be shuffled off to the torture camp at Gitmo straight away. In other words, if the government says somebody is a terrorist then they do not have a right to remain silent. If the government says you’re a terrorist, well then by gosh you must be one. Neocons say skipping the Fifth Amendment is crucial in such cases because the government needs to get “actionable intelligence” from terror suspects. But what kind of intelligence would they get from Mr. Fizzlepants, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab? That he was escorted to the airport in Amsterdam by a well-dressed Indian man who was obviously a military or intelligence operative? Do neocons expect us to believe that if the government waterboarded Abdulmutallab they would get information on sleeper cells or nefarious plots in the making by al-Qaeda, the phantom terror group cobbled together by the CIA? Palin supports the neocon concept of forever war against Muslims. In this respect she is just like Obama and the Democrat version of Bush’s neocons. In December, Tea Party Sarah lauded Obama’s decision to send another 30,000 troops into the Afghan meat grinder. “At long last, President Obama decided to give his military commanders much of what they need to accomplish their mission in Afghanistan,” Palin (or one of her handlers) wrote on her Facebook on December 1, 2009. “We now have an opportunity to build a bipartisan consensus in support of a vital national security priority: defeating Al-Qaeda and its violent extremist allies in Afghanistan and Pakistan, and ensuring that these countries never again serve as bases for terrorist attacks against America and our allies,” she wrote. “We should be in Afghanistan to win.” Palin’s speech at the Salina Area Chamber of Commerce Annual Banquet in Salina, Kansas on February 5, 2010. Part 2, Part 3, Part 4. In regard to the Middle East, Palin sounds just like a run-of-the-mill neocon. “I believe that the Jewish settlements should be allowed to be expanded upon, because that population of Israel is, is going to grow,” Palin told Barbara Walters last November. “More and more Jewish people will be flocking to Israel in the days and weeks and months ahead. And I don’t think that the Obama administration has any right to tell Israel that the Jewish settlements cannot expand.” Once again, Palin gets it wrong. In fact, people are deserting Israel in record numbers, especially educated professionals “who could not be integrated in Israel because of the unsuitability of their professions to the Israeli work force.” Others are leaving because the country is ruled by insane warmongers who are determined to start another war, this time with Iran. Palin supports the Israeli policy of stealing Palestinian land. She also apparently supports the Israeli bombing of civilians in Gaza. Sarah Palin is a neocon Stepford wife. As Justin Raimondo noted back in November of 2008, Sarah had her head stuffed with neocon talking points in the lead-up to the election when she was John McCain’s running mate. “Strapped to a chair and forced to read a year’s worth of Weekly Standards out loud while having the audio version of the complete works of Norman Podhoretz piped into her ears, poor pistol-packin’ Sarah was no match for her neocon interrogators, who ironed all those right-wing populist quirks out of her malleable mindset. Now, Sarah, repeat after me: jury nullification is nuts, forget about Alaskan independence, and always, always remember, you hate Ron Paul!” Raimondo made his albeit sarcastic point in response to a report in the London Telegraph. It stated: “Comments by the governor of Alaska in her first television interview, in which she said NATO may have to go to war with Russia and took a tough line on Iran’s nuclear program, were the result of two weeks of briefings by neoconservatives.” War with Russia and attacking Iran? How is such warmongering insanity compatible with the Tea Party movement? Are Tea Party supporters ready to get behind ever increasing Pentagon budgets (more than $500 billion in 2009) in order to combat terrorists created by the CIA and Mossad? Or is the new Tea Party about spending billions on mass murder while cutting “discretionary” spending? Sounds like Obama to me. Sarah Palin is a thinly disguised Trojan Horse. Her mission is to subvert the Tea Party movement and shepherd its supporters back into the big government and all-war-all-the-time Republican camp. Sarah Palin is a neocon. If the folks who are paying around $500 to attend the Republican love fest in Nashville cannot see this, they are about as clueless as Sarah who would be a babe lost in the woods without her Republican and neocon handlers and speech writers (and Facebook scribblers). Finally, it really is scary how easily the Tea Party movement was played. On CNN last night, one attendee to the fest in Nashville said the idea is to change the Republican party from the inside out and make it the party of the Constitution and individual liberty. I had to laugh. If Tea Party supporters believe this is possible, they may be interested in some oceanfront property I have for sale in Arizona. May 21, 2013 1:26 pm
Emil Buchbinder I was just on the phone with you guy's and I forgot to make one critical point about banks. They create money out of thin air. But it can only be created when someone takes out a loan with them, however they only create the principal. We are forced to go out and find the interest portion. So there is a scarcity built into the equation. This is the definition of a Ponzi Scheme. There is a solution to this problem and that is a nationalized banking system where the government itself and not the private banking cartel Federal Reserve issues the currency. A currency of by and for the people could be issued in enough quantity to avoid this problem. Plus the interest paid on government loans could take the place of INCOME TAXES!!!! Read the book WEB OF DEBT by Ellen Hodgson Brown May 21, 2013 11:44 am
R Al Bain The Republican Party was chosen by the Tea Party movement as a vehicle for change because it was viewed as the weaker party and more closely aligned with their views or at least it's original intent was. The GOP establishment soon caught on and sent in their operatives as to infiltrate, divide and conquer and co-opt so-called Tea Party leaders and it's membership. The carrot was dangled to these individuals with perceived access and positions of power within the "good 'ole boy's club" and they took the bait! http://bainreport.wordpress.com/2013/05/20/is-the-tea-party-over-the-danger-from-within/ May 21, 2013 11:26 am
David Chapin Jim Bakker ....... you are going to associate with THAT THIEVING POS !?!?!?!? Remeber how Bakker cowered under his bunk in prison, where he should STILL be? And Jack VanImpe-of-the-DEVIL that LITTLE weasel who has been profiting by terrifying the Elderly with his FEARNOGRAPHY for 30+ YEARS. May 21, 2013 10:04 am

Join Us Monday through Friday

9:00 am to 12:00pm (Noon)

Listen live on-line at this link: www.patriotvoice.us

106.3 FM in Northern Michigan

Patriot Voice is for you Northern Michigan

Express your Concerns

Express Your Ideas

Listen to Current Topics

Get involved!

We offer three ways to communicate with us during the daily broadcast

Here on our Facebook Fan Page, or chat with Brian Sommerfield or Trucker Randy

Twiiter @bsommerfield or @TruckerRandy

and by phone: 231-347-4382/Toll-Free 855-548-0504

Want to be a guest speaker Contact Brian to schedule

Want to advertise Contact Brian

Brian Sommerfield with Trucker Randy, “Your Defending Fathers”

2 Responses to Welcome

Brian Peterson says:

February 4, 2013 at 4:22 am

You guys rock!!

Reply
Dave Bugg says:

February 22, 2013 at 10:27 am

Hi Brian and Trucker Randy, did you ever find out if there were areas off limits to lawful carry at the convention? I called a few days ago and you said you could check and see if there were any. Thanks, see you in Lansing. Dave.

Reply

Facebook Feed

2 Responses to Welcome

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Recent Comments

Shout Stream

Audio Archive